Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForrest, Clyde W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T20:49:43Z
dc.date.available2020-06-19T20:49:43Z
dc.date.issued1995-07
dc.identifier.citationClyde W. Forrest, Planned Unit Development and Takings Post Dolan, 15 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 571 (1995).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0734-1490
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/22565
dc.description.abstractGrowing tensions between government efforts to require private property use or development in ways that promote the health, safety, and general quality of life within our communities are exacerbated by the so-called "Takings" cases. In Dolan v. City of Tigard, the United States Supreme Court declared a local condition of approval of a development permit to be insufficiently supported by the findings of the city. This article discusses how this decision seriously undermines the traditional presumption of validity of local Planned Unit development permit decisions and imposes a level of proof about such conditions which may result in denials of good development proposals with solvable problems. Flexibility by local governments in permitting valuable development while mitigating health and safety problems through specific conditions must meet a "rough proportionality" test that many small jurisdictions will be hard pressed to establish. Mutual realization by local government and developers of the downside of the "takings" decisions will lead to improved use Planned Unit Development amid other flexibility tools ii local zoning and land use control.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjecttakingsen_US
dc.subjectland useen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmenten_US
dc.subjectpermitsen_US
dc.titlePlanned Unit Development and Takings Post Dolanen_US
dc.type.genreArticleen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record