Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEpstein, Richard A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-19T20:14:46Z
dc.date.available2020-06-19T20:14:46Z
dc.date.issued1995-07
dc.identifier.citationRichard A. Epstein, Introduction; The Harms and Benefits of Nollan and Dolan, 15 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 477 (1995).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0734-1490
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/22562
dc.description.abstractThis address explores the contributions made by Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard to land use law. According to the speaker, the two cases move the analysis in the proper direction by placing constraints on city planners who would require land owners to forfeit property rights as a condition for permission to improve their property. The speaker advocates that the cost of what a government wants to accomplish should be distributed evenly among those who benefit, and not be borne exclusively by one land owner as a condition for a building permit. In addition, the benefit that the land owner receives as a result of the government action should also be figured into the calculation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectland useen_US
dc.subjectbenefitsen_US
dc.subjectcostsen_US
dc.titleIntroduction; The Harms and Benefits of Nollan and Dolanen_US
dc.type.genrePresentation/Lecture/Speechen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record