Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPickerill, J. Mitchellen_US
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Victoria Bryanten_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-03T21:27:47Z
dc.date.available2019-12-03T21:27:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/21652
dc.descriptionAdvisors: J. Mitchell Pickerill.en_US
dc.descriptionCommittee members: Andrea Radasanu; Scot Schraufnagel.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite its unpopularity when used during the American Civil War, conscription was used during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. Conscription, mandatory military service, required America's male population to be registered and serve the nation. These men, between the ages of eighteen and forty-five, fought in these declared and undeclared wars. Conscription laws lapsed, which drastically reduced the size of the military. Members of Congress enacted legislation to initiate new conscription calls to serve the military needs of the nation. President Abraham Lincoln, President Woodrow Wilson, President Franklin Roosevelt, President Harry S. Truman, and President Lyndon Johnson were president when conscription bills were passed by the Congress. Each of these presidents signed the bills into law. While the presidents had not taken an active role regarding the passage of the bill, the bills were signed into law. This project examines the role of the presidents as they delivered proclamations or issued executive orders regarding conscription. Some presidents, however, have been noticeable silent during their terms in office. Presidents verbally encouraged compliance among eligible men and other Americans. These statements often contained strong language that linked compliance to patriotism and a requirement of duty. Other presidents made statements that addressed the fairness of the system while they expressed their intent to improve conscription. Presidents also made statements related to clemency or pardoning of violators. These sources expose the role of the American presidency to elicit support for conscription or empathy for violators. Conscription is an interesting case study to examine amid the theories of critical juncture, path dependency, power of the president, unilateral action, and the Two Presidencies Thesis. In a departure with the militia system, the implementation of federal conscription signifies a critical juncture. In creating this new system, Congress passed legislation to directly conscript men into the United States military. The theories of unilateral action should not be broadly used to explain the actions of all presidents at the time of an active draft. There are, however, few instances in which presidents took unilateral action in regard to conscription. Presidents have followed the action of Congress to draft and pass bills regarding conscription. The Two Presidencies Thesis has been used to explain the deference of Congress to presidents in matters of foreign policy, but conscription remains an example of Congress leading the action. While there are some noted exceptions (such as President Richard Nixon, President Gerald Ford, and President James Carter), presidents have mostly followed Congress rather than take an outward stance regarding conscription.en_US
dc.format.extent103 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois Universityen_US
dc.rightsNIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.en_US
dc.subject.lcshPolitical scienceen_US
dc.titleBeyond branch : an examination of the American presidency and conscription policiesen_US
dc.type.genreDissertation/Thesisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreeM.A. (Master of Arts)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record