Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMiller, Charles E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Stelle, Kit R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-02T14:03:34Z
dc.date.available2016-05-02T14:03:34Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.urihttp://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/16310
dc.descriptionBibliography: pages [64]-66.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research examined the factors that affect the allocation of resources (e.g., salary increments, space, etc.) among faculty members in academic departments. The following factors were hypothesized to affect resource allocations: (a) Environmental power, defined as bringing resources such as funding or prestige into the department, (b) institutional power, defined as committee membership or general visibility within the institution, (c) congruence, defined as the match between the contributions of individual faculty members and the orientation of their departments (research or teaching/service), (d) personal power, defined as rank or years since the Ph.D., (e) status, defined as how a faculty member is perceived by his or her peers, (f) negotiation frequency, defined as how often a faculty member negotiates for resources, and (g) five types of negotiation strategies. Analyses revealed that, as hypothesized, congruence between departmental orientation and the contributions of individual faculty members affected resource allocations. Congruent faculty members received significantly more resources than noncongruent faculty members. Also as hypothesized, congruent faculty gained resources if they adopted a negotiation strategy of emphasizing their own needs rather than the needs of others (such as their department or the university). As hypothesized, environmental power accounted for a significant amount of variance in resources in the overall analyses, and accounted for more variance in resources in research departments as in teaching/service departments (in fact, twice as much). Contrary to expectations, institutional power did not account for a significant amount of variance in resources for teaching/service departments, but did affect allocations in research departments. In addition, when average salary increment was examined separately from the other resource measures, negotiation frequency was found to be the best predictor.en_US
dc.format.extentvi, 77 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois Universityen_US
dc.rightsNIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.en_US
dc.subject.lcshCollege teachersen_US
dc.subject.lcshResource allocationen_US
dc.subject.lcshUniversities and colleges--Administrationen_US
dc.titleFactors affecting the allocation of resources among faculty members in academic departmentsen_US
dc.type.genreDissertation/Thesisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeM.A. (Master of Arts)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record