Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrenner, Susan W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-03T21:19:23Z
dc.date.available2021-01-03T21:19:23Z
dc.date.issued1987-05
dc.identifier.citationSusan W. Brenner, "Crossing-Over:" The Issue-Preclusive Effects of a Civil/Criminal Adjudication Upon a Proceeding of the Opposite Character, 7 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 141 (1987).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0734-1490
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/22786
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the area of "cross-over" collateral estoppel in civil/criminal actions. The article examines the legal history of the concept that a validly-entered judgment has issue-preclusive effects in a subsequent litigation. Following the exploration of collateral estoppel which "crosses over" from a civil to a criminal litigation, or vice versa, the article concludes that conventional arguments regarding the disutility of "cross-over" estoppel should be rejected, to be replaced with an analytical approach which recognizes the specific virtues which the concept can exhibit in an appropriate context.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectlitigationen_US
dc.subjectcollateral estoppelen_US
dc.subjectjudgmentsen_US
dc.title"Crossing-Over:" The Issue-Preclusive Effects of a Civil/Criminal Adjudication Upon a Proceeding of the Opposite Characteren_US
dc.type.genreArticleen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentOtheren_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record