Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOlson, Frederick V.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-03T20:56:01Z
dc.date.available2020-10-03T20:56:01Z
dc.date.issued1992-05
dc.identifier.citationFrederick V. Olson, Note, Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.: Reasoned or Result Oriented Jurisprudence?, 12 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 497 (1992).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0734-1490
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/22655
dc.description.abstractThis note examines the United States Supreme Court decision finding a private litigant's use of peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on account of race in a civil case constituted "state action" and violated the excluded jurors' equal protection rights. The author examines the Court's decision and concludes that the finding of "state action" was not based on reasoned jurisprudence.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectjury selectionen_US
dc.subjectraceen_US
dc.subjectperemptory challengeen_US
dc.subjectequal protectionen_US
dc.subjectjurorsen_US
dc.subjectstate actionen_US
dc.titleEdmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.: Reasoned or Result Oriented Jurisprudence?en_US
dc.type.genreArticleen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Lawen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record