Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSlifer, Russell D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-24T21:13:59Z
dc.date.available2020-06-24T21:13:59Z
dc.date.issued1993-05
dc.identifier.citationRussell D. Slifer, Comment, En Banc Ruling Bursts More than Bubbles in Patent Litigation: A.C. Aukerman Co. v. RL Chaides Construction Co. and its Impact, 13 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 335 (1993).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0734-1490
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/22621
dc.description.abstractThis comment explains the development and application of both laches and equitable estoppel defenses in patent litigation. The comment focuses on the recent Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision changing the evidentiary requirements needed to overcome a presumption of laches. In addition to the changes made to laches, the reduction in elements needed to establish equitable estoppel are reviewed. The author concludes that the changes to laches fail to provide additional protection where additional protection is justified, while the reduced elements of estoppel decrease protection for patent owners.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois University Law Reviewen_US
dc.subjectlawen_US
dc.subjectlachesen_US
dc.subjectestoppelen_US
dc.subjectpatentsen_US
dc.subjectlitigationen_US
dc.titleEn Banc Ruling Bursts More than Bubbles in Patent Litigation: A.C. Aukerman Co. v. RL Chaides Construction Co. and its Impacten_US
dc.type.genreArticleen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Lawen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record