Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGreen, Gerald G.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorHackamack, Lawrence C. (Lawrence Carroll), 1921-en_US
dc.contributor.authorCaruso, Peter Franken_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-12T14:27:25Z
dc.date.available2019-04-12T14:27:25Z
dc.date.issued1969
dc.identifier.urihttps://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/19848
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to discover the extent to which in-plant cost reducation programs are used. Library research was used to provide background information for the study. A questionnaire survey, however, was used to obtain "pulse readings" of companies using cost reduction programs. The data revealed the flowing: 1. The five sizes of firms using cost reduction programs. 2. The type of products made by those firms using programs, as far as use and market are concerned. 3. The ratio of incentive plans having an influence on management to conduct a program. 4. The extent to which firms with production work standards are motivated in using programs. 5. The effect unions have on management's decision to conduct a program. 6. The effects programs have on employees, as far as productivity, morale, and turnover are concerned. 7. The effectiveness of cost reduction programs as a management tool for cost control. 8. The extent to which programs were used: what types were used, when were they last used, by whom were they administered, and were they successful. The study reached the following conclusions: 1. Cost reduction programs were used by manufacturing-type firms with employees totalling 250, 500, 1000, 2000, and over 2000. 2. Programs were conducted by manufacturing-type firms regardless of the product's use or market. 3. The ratio of incentive plans having an influence on management's decision to conduct a program is 100%, plant sizes of 500, 2000, and over 2000 employees. 4. 75 percent of the firms indicated that their day work payment plan had an effect on management's decision to conduct a program, plant size of 500 employees. Ratios of 60 and 61 percent were recorded for plants sizes of 2000 and over 2000 employees, respectively. 5. 90 percent of the firms using programs had over half their work force covered by production work standards. 6. Programs increase employee productivity and morale in most instances but show little effect on labor turnover. 7. Almost unanimously, firms stated that programs were an effective tool for cost control. 8. Programs of various types were extensively used; within the past 6 months many had been used; in practically all instances programs were successful. From these conclusions, the following recommendations are made: 1. Cost reduction programs should be expanded to include indirect labor areas of the plant. 2. Programs should be used as a complement and not as a substitute for production work standards. 3. A well planned, co-ordinated, and administered program should be conducted on a continual basis. 4. Manager in industrial engineering should administer the program.en_US
dc.format.extentix, 108 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherNorthern Illinois Universityen_US
dc.rightsNIU theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from Huskie Commons for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without the written permission of the authors.en_US
dc.subject.lcshCost controlen_US
dc.titlePulse readings of cost reduction programsen_US
dc.type.genreDissertation/Thesisen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Managementen_US
dc.description.degreeM.S. (Master of Science)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record