Huskie Commons

Respecting State Judicial Articles

Show simple item record Parness, Jeffrey A. en_US 2017-12-04T17:53:19Z 2017-12-04T17:53:19Z 1990
dc.identifier.citation Jeffrey A. Parness, Respecting State Judicial Articles, 3 Emerging Issues in St. Const. L. 65 (1990). en_US
dc.description.abstract Differences in the establishment and empowerment of American judicial systems should trigger variations in the ways in which cases are handled and law is practiced. Such differences are found in the sections of state constitutions dealing with the judiciary and known as judicial articles. Unfortunately, those differences are often overlooked. Perhaps the oversight is partially attributable to the widely held view that any variations in the constitutional foundations of judicial systems are meaningless, in that no practical consequences flow from them. In effect this view parallels the popular notion that all seemingly comparable branches of state governments actually have comparable powers, and that whatever differences exist originate chiefly from such non-constitutional sources as political ideology and community setting. A circuit court is a circuit court is a circuit court. When you've seen one intermediate appellate court, you've seen them all. Those sentiments are troubling because the differences in state judicial articles are meaningful and should result in significant consequences in judicial powers. Under current American constitutional law, all trial courts do not possess the same power to make substantive law; all high courts do not possess the same authority to regulate the practice of law; and all judges do not possess the same responsibility for checking legislative conduct. This article will first explore some of the current differences in state judicial articles, as well as some of the historical changes in the judicial article of Illinois. The article will then highlight a few of the consequences that should flow from those differences. A brief discussion of a few problems in differentiating state judicial articles will conclude this article. In calling for more attention to constitutional language, this paper urges that as there has developed an increased sensitivity to the differences in individual rights from one American state to another, there should also develop a heightened recognition of and respect for variations in the structure, function and operation of American judicial systems. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject law en_US
dc.subject state constitutions en_US
dc.subject state judicial articles en_US
dc.subject court powers en_US
dc.subject court authority en_US
dc.subject legislative oversight en_US
dc.subject regulation of the practice of law en_US
dc.title Respecting State Judicial Articles en_US
dc.type.genre Article en_US
dc.type Text en_US
dc.contributor.department College of Law en_US
dc.rights.statement In Copyright en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search Huskie Commons


My Account