Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllori, Valiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-05T16:34:22Z
dc.date.available2016-04-05T16:34:22Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citation"Maxwell's Paradox: Classical Electrodynamics and its Time Reversal Invariance." Analytica 1:1-19 (2015).en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://commons.lib.niu.edu/handle/10843/16044
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I argue that the recent discussion on the time - reversal invariance of classical electrodynamics (see (Albert 2000: ch.1), (Arntzenius 2004), (Earman 2002), (Malament 2004),(Horwich 1987: ch.3)) can be best understood assuming that the disagreement among the various authors is actually a disagreement about the metaphysics of classical electrodynamics. If so, the controversy will not be resolved until we have established which alternative is the most natural. It turns out that we have a paradox, namely that the following three claims are incompatible: the electromagnetic fields are real, classical electrodynamics is time-reversal invariant, and the content of the state of affairs of the world does not depend on whether it belongs to a forward or a backward sequence of states of the world.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAnalyticaen_US
dc.subjectClassical Electrodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectSymmetriesen_US
dc.subjectField Ontologyen_US
dc.titleMaxwell's Paradox: Classical Electrodynamics and its Time Reversal Invarianceen_US
dc.type.genreArticleen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record